Managing the Crowd: Towards a Taxonomy of Crowdsourcing Processes

332 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A method for taxonomy development and its application in information systems (2013, methodology): “We have also taught our method to other researchers who have used it to develop taxonomies for their research (Geiger et al, 2011; Krug et al, 2012).”
Examining Crowd Work and Gig Work Through the Historical Lens of Piecework (2017, background): “For years, such labor was limited to information work such as data annotation and surveys [82, 161, 166, 51, 119].”
Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition (2012, background): “Moreover, the theoretical knowledge base is still not solid, being developed with works like Brabham’s, in which he defines crowdsourcing [4] and creates a typology of it [5]; Vukovic’s, in which she makes a general overview of various characteristics of crowdsourcing including the kind of crowd tha”
Social identity and signalling success factors in online crowdfunding (2016, background): “…means relying on the Internet to directly seek financial support from the general public (Belleflamme, Lambert, and Schwienbacher 2014; Geiger et al. 2011; Kleemann, voß, and Rieder 2008; Lambert and Schwienbacher 2010; Mollick 2014; Schwienbacher and Larralde 2010; voelker and…”