Firms’ corporate social responsibility behavior: An integration of institutional and profit maximization approaches

183 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Country-level institutions, firm value, and the role of corporate social responsibility initiatives (2017, background): “Young and Makhija (2014) provide a thorough discussion and integration of CSR theories.”
A Review of the Nonmarket Strategy Literature (2016, unknown): “Institutional theory studies explored the moderating role of government policy and regulations (Vaaler & Schrage, 2009; Young & Makhija, 2014).”
The Social Responsibility of International Business: From Ethics and the Environment to CSR and Sustainable Development (2016, unknown): “…1988; Rowan & Campbell, 1983) appears to have declined, despite ongoing contestation as to labor costs and working conditions, especially in the context of outsourcing and offshoring in international value chains (cf. Schmeisser, 2013) and employee-related CSR (e.g. Young & Makhija, 2014).”
How global is international CSR research? Insights and recommendations from a systematic review (2017, background): “Young and Makhija (2014) have, for instance, argued and empirically shown that variations in ﬁ rms ’ economic visibility and economic vulnerability can impact their need for societal goodwill and, in turn, their quest for legitimacy.”