Interpretation of bioassays in the study of interactions between soil organisms and plants: involvement of nutrient factors

By S. R. Troelstra, R. Wagenaar, W. Smant, B. Peters. 2001

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0f0a88743aa13f2cbaff343fa85e98b0dfd7ca50

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Plant-soil feedbacks: a meta-analytical review. (2008, background): “The natural experiment approach can eliminate the time required for phase I, and field-collected soils may reflect more natural soil conditions, but this approach is susceptible to uncontrolled differences among sampling sites (Troelstra et al. 2001; Baack et al. 2006; Ellis & Weis 2006).”
Reduced plant–soil feedback of plant species expanding their range as compared to natives (2007, methodology): “Experiments with sterilized soil are often confounded by nutrient release due to the sterilization procedure (Troelstra et al. 2001; McNamara et al. 2003).”
Soil biota and invasive plants. (2006, background): “Second, sterilization can cause nutrient flushes (Troelstra et al., 2001); however, in the C.”
Plant-soil biota interactions and spatial distribution of black cherry in its native and invasive ranges (2003, methodology): “Soil inoculum was diluted with a 2 : 1 v/v sterile potting soil to avoid potential confounding effects of nutrient release by soil sterilization (see Troelstra et al. 2001); a foliar contact fungicide (Euparen-M; Bayer Inc., 2003 Blackwell Publishing Ltd/CNRS Leverkusen, Germany) was applied to…”
Plant–soil interactions in the expansion and native range of a poleward shifting plant species (2010, background): “The use of sterilized and nonsterilized soil inocula might have caused some differences in available nutrients, which are released from the biotic soil component as a result of sterilization (Troelstra et al., 2001).”
Plant community development is affected by nutrients and soil biota (2004, background): “…soil results from the net effect of the absence of root pathogens, root herbivores and root symbionts (Bever et al. 1997), as well as from the initial nutrient flush and the temporary absence of nutrient immobilization into soil microbial biomass in the sterilized soil (Troelstra et al. 2001).”
Rhizosphere fauna: the functional and structural diversity of intimate interactions of soil fauna with plant roots (2009, unknown): “Phytophagous nematodes have been estimated to take up as much as one quarter of the net primary production of grassland vegetation (Stanton 1988), and they affect plant quality (Troelstra et al. 2001), plant diversity, and vegetation succession (De Deyn et al.”
Plant–soil feedbacks: role of plant functional group and plant traits (2016, methodology): “sterilization-induced nutrient flushes (Troelstra et al. 2001).”
Independent variations of plant and soil mixtures reveal soil feedback effects on plant community overyielding (2013, methodology): “Therefore, we quantified the effects of sterilization on nutrient availability and carried out an additional nutrient experiment to test whether growth limitations under non-sterilized conditions were due to low nutrient availability (Troelstra et al. 2001).”
Soil feedback and pathogen activity in Prunus serotina throughout its native range (2005, background): “Soil sterilization is known to create a flush of nutrients and have positive effects on plant growth (Troelstra et al. 2001).”
Development of a negative plant–soil feedback in the expansion zone of the clonal grass Ammophila arenaria following root formation and nematode colonization (2002, background): “Singling out effects of nutrients, pathogens, parasites, mutualists and free-living antagonists complicates plant–soil feedback studies (Troelstra et al. 2001).”