Psychological Dynamics of Sport and Exercise
By D. Gill, Lavon Williams. 2008
285 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ef0b25d4f27a142512610ff175348edce84243a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Ronald E. Smith
- S. Cumming
- F. Smoll
- J. Côté
- Paige Bentley Greason
- Craig S. Cashwell
- Mark S. Allen
- Marc V Jones
Citations in the corpus
- The influence of Sport Education on student motivation in physical education (2009, background): “Intrinsic motivation occurs when individuals engage voluntarily in an activity for its own sake, whereas, extrinsic motivation occurs when individuals are motivated by external factors, such as rewards and social recognition (Gill 2000).”
- A new view: exploring positive youth development in elite sport contexts (2011, background): “Also, as body image concerns are particularly salient for females (Gill 2000), elite sport may help to enhance self-perceptions of fitness and, as demonstrated through the current study, may allow young athletes to feel confident about their bodies and the importance of being fit for life.”
- Is Winning Everything? The Relative Contributions of Motivational Climate and Won-Lost Percentage in Youth Sports (2007, background): “This finding has frequently been cited in sport psychology textbooks (e.g., Gill, 2006; LeUnes & Nation, 2002; Weinberg & Gould, 2007; Williams, 2006).”
- Mindfulness and counseling self-efficacy: The mediating role of attention and empathy. (2009, background): “, medicine, sports) are beginning to see the value in attention control training (Epstein 1999, 2003a, 2003b; Gill, 2000).”
- Personality in sport: a comprehensive review (2013, background): “…impetus behind personality research in sport, Vealey (2002) observed that ‘many researchers . . . believe that sport personality research has yielded no useful findings’ (p. 71) while Gill and Williams (2008) comment that ‘most scholars see little value in global personality measures’ (p. 46).”