Design Science in Information Systems Research

By Alan R. Hevner, S. March, Jinsoo Park, Sudha Ram. MIS Q., 2004

12,958 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0ee5a26a6dc64d3089c8f872bd550bf1eab7051d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Gaining Customer Experience Insights That Matter (2018, methodology): “In this section we demonstrate how to apply our conceptual framework using data mining and design science research methods (e.g., Chapman et al. 2000; Hevner et al. 2004).”
Design Principles for Competence Management Systems: A Synthesis of an Action Research Study (2004, methodology): “Design is central to the information systems discipline (Hevner et al. 2004; Markus et al. 2002), MIS Quarterly Vol. 28 No. 3/September 2004 437 and the action research method, with its iterative hypothesis development and testing, is particularly appropriate for the development of system design…”
Experimentation in Software Engineering (2012, background): “Design and action: Theories that describe how to do things, typically prescriptive in the form of design science [76].”
Dimensionality Reduction via Matrix Factorization for Predictive Modeling from Large, Sparse Behavioral Data (2015, methodology): “There a few diﬀerent ways to approach design science research in Information Systems (Hevner et al. 2004).”
Eight key issues for the decision support systems discipline (2008, background): “[38] is an important step in this improvement.”
Towards Designing Cooperative and Social Conversational Agents for Customer Service (2017, methodology): “We pursue to iteratively design and evaluate a CA artifact on the baseline of existing theory (e.g., Grice’s (1975) cooperative principle of conversation) informing the artifact design (Hevner et al. 2004).”
Work System Theory: Overview of Core Concepts, Extensions, and Challenges for the Future (2013, methodology): “The development and inclusion of the work system metamodel is consistent with the tenet of design science research (e.g., Hevner et al., 2004) that the shortcomings of designed artifacts should be identified and remedied if possible.”
Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process (2009, neutral): “On the other hand, rigour is derived from an effective use of the existing knowledge base (cf. Hevner et al. 2004, p. 88).”
A Framework for Theory Development in Design Science Research: Multiple Perspectives (2012, neutral): “In a DSRIS project, the overarching context is one of a business problem situation (Hevner et al., 2004).”
MetaFraud: A Meta-Learning Framework for Detecting Financial Fraud (2012, methodology): “To achieve this objective, we adopted the design science paradigm to guide the development of the IT artifact, the MetaFraud framework (Hevner et al. 2004).”
Toward Meaningful Engagement: A Framework for Design and Research of Gamified Information Systems (2017, background): “Particularly, the design and evaluation of IT artifacts, a key paradigm for IS research, is receiving more attention as we better understand ways to conduct and publish such research (Goes 2014; Gregor and Hevner 2013; Hevner et al. 2004).”
Explaining Data-Driven Document Classifications (2014, neutral): “We now present an empirical case study (Hevner et al. 2004) onthe problem of classifying web pages as containing adult content.”