An instance theory of attention and memory.

By Gordon D. Logan. Psychology Review, 2002

441 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0b74cfcea6af8fc42acda480a191c3c1d30b9e05

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Executive control of visual attention in dual-task situations. (2001, unknown): “Logan (2001) related TVA formally to Nosofskys (1984, 1986, 1988)generalized context model of classification (GCM) and Nosofsky and Palmeris (1997; also see Palmeri, 1997) EBRW model of speeded classification, which provide quantitative accounts of an impressive range of phenomena in the categorizat”
On the capacity of attention: its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. (2005, background): “The premise behind this task appears to be that it is a way to measure attentional capacity; attending to information may be tantamount to selecting objects by categorizing them (see Logan, 2002).”
A dual-stage two-phase model of selective attention. (2010, methodology): “However, the crucial difference to traditional views is that they are considered two aspects of the same process rather than two different stages of processing (see also the discussion of this issue in Logan, 2002).”
CONTEXTUAL WORD LEARNING DURING READING IN A SECOND LANGUAGE (2017, background): “Learning curves are curvilinear (Figure 1), following an exponential function (Heathcote, Brown, & Mewhort, 2000) or a power function (Logan, 2002).”
In Opposition to Inhibition (2003, background): “Our most direct intellectual debts are to Logan (1988; 2002) and Neill (e.g., Neill & Mathis, 1998).”
Intertrial priming stemming from ambiguity: A new account of priming in visual search (2006, background): “One version of such a response selection view, stemming from the task switching literature, suggests that intertrial benefits result mostly from retrieval of task-relevant episodic memories (Logan, 2002; Neill, 1997; Waszak et al., 2003).”
A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology. (2005, methodology): “In this case, encoding of objects into VSTM can be described by a random-walk model with exponentially distributed interstep times (cf. Logan, 2002; Logan & Gordon, 2001).”
SSL: a theory of how people learn to select strategies. (2006, methodology): “Exemplar models have been successfully applied in various domains, for example, memory (Hintzman, 1988), automatization (Logan, 1988), likelihood judgments (Dougherty, Gettys, & Ogden, 1999), and attention (Logan, 2002).”
The speed-accuracy tradeoff: history, physiology, methodology, and behavior (2014, background): “…1978; Busemeyer and Townsend, 1993; Ratcliff and Smith, 2004), Race/Accumulator (Pike, 1968; Vickers and Smith, 1985; Smith and Vickers, 1988; Logan, 2002), Leaky-Competing Accumulator (Usher and McClelland, 2001), LATER (Carpenter and Williams, 1995; Reddi and Carpenter, 2000), and Linear…”
Working Memory, Fluid Intelligence, and Attention Are Predictors of Multitasking Performance, but Polychronicity and Extraversion Are Not (2005, background): “Bottleneck theorists (e.g., Logan, 2002) argue that interference occurs because certain mental operations cannot be divided, resulting in a bottleneck that allows only one task to pass through at a time.”
The physics of optimal decision making: a formal analysis of models of performance in two-alternative forced-choice tasks. (2006, methodology): “Following the seminal work of Lorden (1977), Dragalin et al.”
Aging and motivated cognition: the positivity effect in attention and memory. (2005, background): “As attended information is more likely to be remembered than nonattended information, initial attention provides one ﬁlter of the incoming information stream [26].”