Individual values, social identity, and optimal distinctiveness.

By Constantine Sedikides, M. Brewer. 2001

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0a58fe631e0f071d888072feff3aed7596c2cbd9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The relational self: an interpersonal social-cognitive theory. (2002, background): “Nonetheless, we hold to the view that a model that integrates the multiple levels at which the self may exist in relation to others will ultimately be most fruitful (see Brewer & Roccas, 2001).”
Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. (2007, background): “Brewer and Roccas (2001) have argued that the very emphasis on individual autonomy and responsibility that characterizes American culture on the agency belief element gives rise to high need for inclusion and”
Individual Self, Relational Self, Collective Self: Hierarchical Ordering of the Tripartite Self (2011, background): “Finally, the collective self may accord the optimal level of self-definition by simultaneously meeting competing needs for assimilation through intergroup comparisons and differentiation through intragroup comparisons, respectively (Brewer and Roccas 2001).”
Work Group Inclusion: Test of a Scale and Model (2020, background): “Some researchers believe that the two needs of belongingness and uniqueness might be opposing if strived for at the same level (e.g., intragroup level, Brewer & Roccas, 2001).”
Social Projection to Ingroups and Outgroups: A Review and Meta-Analysis (2005, unknown): “Together, the need to be similar and the need to be different serve the superordinate need to have a clearly demarcated social identity (Brewer & Roccas, 2001).”
Black and Belonging at School: A Case for Interpersonal, Instructional, and Institutional Opportunity Structures (2018, background): “These supports are critical, considering that the need for distinctiveness is a basic human motive that exists cross-culturally (Becker et al., 2012; Brewer & Roccas, 2001).”
The presence of the past: Identity continuity and group dynamics (2015, background): “…with essentialist in-groups because these satisfy motivational principles, such as uncertainty reduction (Hogg & Abrams, 1993), distinctiveness (Brewer & Roccas, 2001), and efficacy (Yzerbyt, Castano, Leyens, & Paladino, 2000), the explanatory role of selfcontinuity has remained largely…”
Inclusion: Conceptualization and measurement (2014, background): “According to ODT (Brewer, 1991; Brewer & Roccas, 2001), people have the opposing fundamental needs for belongingness and uniqueness.”