The Future of a Mistake: Will Discrepancy Measurement Continue to Make the Learning Disabilities Field a Pseudoscience?

By K. Stanovich. 2005

154 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/09bc38321230a42f236cf79e2467397383ce8887

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Randy J. Bachmeier
2. Gretchen B. LeFever
3. J. Kauffman
4. K. Kavale

In Statistics and Probability

1. Randy J. Bachmeier
2. Gretchen B. LeFever
3. J. Kauffman
4. K. Kavale

Citations in the corpus

• Response-to-Intervention: Separating the Rhetoric of Self-Congratulation from the Reality of Specific Learning Disability Identification (2008, methodology): “The vision of the anointed included a polemical campaign to eliminate discrep ancy from SLD identification procedures (e.g., Aaron, 1997; Stanovich, 2005; Sternberg & Grigorenko, 2002).”