Differential Association of Uniquely and Non Uniquely Human Emotions with the Ingroup and the Outgroup

By Maria Paola Paladino, J. Leyens, Ramon T Rodriguez, Armando Rodríguez, R. Gaunt, S. Demoulin. 2002

213 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/08cacded3ed83e09aa78195ceb97360bbdc397c6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Dehumanization: An Integrative Review (2006, methodology): “Secondary emotions are also preferentially associated with the ingroup when implicit methods are used (Gaunt, Leyens, & Demoulin, 2002; Paladino et al., 2002).”
Understanding the Relationship between Attribute-Based and Metaphor-Based Dehumanization (2009, background): “748 of humanness, specifi cally the denial of uniquely human emotions to outgroup members (Boccato, Cortes, Demoulin, & Leyens, 2007; Leyens et al., 2001; Paladino et al., 2002).”
The uniquely human content of stereotypes (2010, unknown): “Many studies have shown that secondary emotions are preferentially associated with the in-group when automatic measures are used (Boccato, Cortes, Demoulin, & Leyens, 2007; Gaunt, Leyens, & Demoulin, 2002; Paladino et al., 2002).”
The Politics of Emotion in Everyday Life: “Appropriate” Emotion and Claims on Identity (2005, background): “…of recent studies on in-groups’ perspectives on their own and on out-groups’ emotions illustrates how beliefs about emotion may create the conditions for understanding and valuing in-group emotional responses differently from those of an out-group (Leyens et al., 2000, 2001; Paladino et al., 2002).”
Dehumanization: A New Perspective (2007, unknown): “Previous work, using the Implicit Association Task, has documented implicit infrahumanization (Paladino et al., 2002), with an in-group being associated more strongly with secondary emotions than an out-group.”
We are human, they are not: Driving forces behind outgroup dehumanisation and the humanisation of the ingroup (2012, methodology): “Similar results were obtained in several independent studies using a variety of methods (e.g., Demoulin et al., 2005; Paladino et al., 2002; Paladino & Vaes, 2009; Rodriguez et al., 2011; but see Rohmann, Niedenthal, Brauer, Castano, & Leyens, 2009).”
Attributing and denying humanness to others (2008, methodology): “Implicit methods have previously been used to support infrahumanisation theory predictions (eg, Paladino et al, 2002 ).”