Institutions and Forms of Co-ordination in Innovation Systems

By Bart Nooteboom. 2000

212 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/08317e46031af0464bcf6a17ada78dc40eb91577

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Organisation and Governance of Urban Energy Systems: District Heating and Cooling in the UK (2013, background): “Interactive learning, and development of locally-embedded expertise seems to be facilitated in more stable social and financial arrangements, such as those evident in the less formal, trust-based German system than in US more formal contract-based innovation system, characterised by relatively mobil”
Managing competences in entrepreneurial technology firms: a comparative institutional analysis of Germany, Sweden and the UK (2004, background): “More organised or “coordinated market economies” (CMEs) like Germany, by contrast, have developed institutions that advantage long-term and incremental innovation strategies, but inhibit more radical innovation paths (Hall and Soskice, 2001; compare Nooteboom, 2000; Whitley, 2000; 2002).”
How Open Innovation Affects the Drivers of Competitive Advantage (2012, background): “At the level of the individual it includes work by Nooteboom (2000); Rodan and Galunic (2004).”
Contextualising Regional Innovation Systems in a Globalising Learning Economy: On Knowledge Bases and Institutional Frameworks (2005, background): “As such it pieces together consistent configurations of institutions and the implications for innovative performance (Nooteboom, 2000).”
Bridging Uncertainty in Management Consulting: The Mechanisms of Trust and Networked Reputation (2003, background): “Experience is an authentic way of assessing another person’s action and helps to establish trust in the sense of the expectation ‘that damage will not be caused even though there is both an opportunity and an incentive for the partner to cause damage’ (Nooteboom 2000a: 921).”