Adherence in Internet Interventions for Anxiety and Depression: Systematic Review

By Helen Christensen, K. Griffiths, L. Farrer. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 2009

1,173 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Background Open access websites which deliver cognitive and behavioral interventions for anxiety and depression are characterised by poor adherence. We need to understand more about adherence in order to maximize the impact of Internet-based interventions on the disease burden associated with common mental disorders. Objective The aims of this paper are to review briefly the adherence literature with respect to Internet interventions and to investigate the rates of dropout and compliance in randomized controlled trials of anxiety and depression Web studies. Methods A systematic review of randomized controlled trials using Internet interventions for anxiety and depression was conducted, and data was collected on dropout and adherence, predictors of adherence, and reasons for dropout. Results Relative to reported rates of dropout from open access sites, the present study found that the rates of attrition in randomized controlled trials were lower, ranging from approximately 1 - 50%. Predictors of adherence included disease severity, treatment length, and chronicity. Very few studies formally examined reasons for dropout, and most studies failed to use appropriate statistical techniques to analyze missing data. Conclusions Dropout rates from randomized controlled trials of Web interventions are low relative to dropout from open access websites. The development of theoretical models of adherence is as important in the area of Internet intervention research as it is in the behavioral health literature. Disease-based factors in anxiety and depression need further investigation.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06e53719b6f3018bd0bebdde8fb30cac676ec3de

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

  1. Gerhard Andersson
  2. Heleen Riper
  3. David C. Mohr
  4. Stephen M. Schueller
  5. Robert West
  6. Susan Michie
  7. E. B. Davies
  8. C. Glazebrook

In General Health Professions

  1. Susan Michie
  2. David C. Mohr
  3. Robert West
  4. Gerhard Andersson
  5. E. B. Davies
  6. C. Glazebrook
  7. Stephen M. Schueller
  8. R. Morriss

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Heleen Riper
  2. E. B. Davies
  3. C. Glazebrook
  4. R. Morriss
  5. Gerhard Andersson
  6. Stephen M. Schueller
  7. David C. Mohr
  8. A. Ly

Citations in the corpus