Behavioral Intervention Technologies: Evidence review and recommendations for future research

By David C. Mohr, M. Burns, Stephen M. Schueller, G. Clarke, Michael S. Klinkman. General Hospital Psychiatry, 2010

679 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This paper reports on the findings of a technical expert panel convened by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Institute of Mental Health, charged with reviewing the state of research on behavioral intervention technologies (BITs) in mental health and identifying the top research priorities. BITs is the comprehensive term used to refer to behavioral and psychological interventions that use information and communication technology features to address behavioral and mental health outcomes. Mental health BITs using videoconferencing and standard telephone technologies to deliver psychotherapy have been wellvalidated. Web-based interventions have shown efficacy across a broad range of mental health outcomes, although outcomes vary widely. Social media such as online support groups have produced generally disappointing outcomes when used alone. Mobile technologies have received limited attention for mental health outcomes, although findings from behavioral health suggest they are promising. Virtual reality has shown good efficacy for anxiety and pediatric disorders. Serious gaming has received relatively little work in mental health. Recommendations for next step research in each of these are made. Research focused on understanding of reach, adherence, barriers and cost is recommended. As BITs can generate large amounts of data, improvements in the collection, storage, analysis, and visualization of big data will be required. Traditional psychological and behavioral theories have proven insufficient to understand how BITs produce behavioral change. Thus new theoretical models, as well as new evaluation strategies, will be required. Finally, for BITs to have a public health impact, research on implementation and application to prevention will be required.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/210c8e2b63163486e8adcb2e6aa43fe1fa3894d8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

  1. F. Eiroa-Orosa
  2. Itai Ivtzan
  3. Annika Howells
  4. Stephen M. Schueller
  5. Linda M. Collins
  6. David C. Mohr
  7. Parisa Rashidi
  8. Enid N. H. Montague

In Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

  1. Susan A. Murphy

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Stephen M. Schueller
  2. Parisa Rashidi
  3. Linda M. Collins
  4. Enid N. H. Montague
  5. Itai Ivtzan
  6. David C. Mohr
  7. M. Burns

Citations in the corpus