Reflective design

By Phoebe Sengers, Kirsten Boehner, Shay David, Jofish Kaye. Critical Computing, 2005

950 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Information Systems, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06c5e804c0f0292231d2d7be407bf3f1ac01c0d3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

In Information Systems

In Human-Computer Interaction

Citations in the corpus

Better, Nicer, Clearer, Fairer: A Critical Assessment of the Movement for Ethical Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (2019, background): “These include Value-Sensitive Design (VSD) [29], Values @ Play [30], reflective design [31], adversarial design”
Human-centered Explainable AI: Towards a Reflective Sociotechnical Approach (2020, background): “By reflection, we refer to “critical reflection [that] brings unconscious aspects of experience to conscious awareness, thereby making them available for conscious choice” [36].”
Do Datasets Have Politics? Disciplinary Values in Computer Vision Dataset Development (2021, positive): “The acknowledgment of values in computing led Friedman to develop a value-sensitive approach to designing systems [40], which has gone on to influence many design frameworks and approaches [1, 11, 30, 31, 77, 104].”
Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI (2010, methodology): “In this we build on prior work drawing on critical theory such as Bardzell’s interaction criticism [8,9,13,69] by moving criticism from a focus on particular interaction designs to the state of the field overall.”
Values as lived experience: evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery (2009, methodology): “We believe the use of methods such as these can strengthen VSD as a methodological umbrella, helping to align wide ranging work within HCI: from the variety of work presented as “probes” [20, 26, 41], to work that looks to express empathy and accommodate user-created meaning [24, 32, 52], to complim”
Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation (2006, methodology): “While dynamic feedback can be incorporated into system design [see e.g. 8, 39], it can also be used as part of evaluation.”
HCI as heterodoxy: Technologies of identity and the queering of interaction with computers (2011, background): “By contrast a smaller group of researchers border the neigh- bouring disciplinary fields of STS (science and technology studies) and computer ethics and engage extensively in critical reflection, such as Sengers et al. (2005), Blevis (2007) and Flanagan and Nissenbaum (2007).”
Reflecting on reflection: framing a design landscape (2010, background): “Sengers et al. (2005) further talk about the emergence of reflective design that combines analysis of the ways in which technologies reflect and perpetuate unconscious cultural assumptions, with design, building, and evaluation of new computing devices that reflect alternative possibilities .”
Critical Making: Conceptual and Material Studies in Technology and Social Life (2011, background): “Relevant examples include critical design (Dunne 2005), critical technical practice (Agre 1997), and reflective practice (Sengers et al. 2005).”
Decolonial AI: Decolonial Theory as Sociotechnical Foresight in Artificial Intelligence (2020, background): “This role of contextual values also applies to the work of computing and technology (Nissenbaum 2001; Van de Poel and Kroes 2014)—a recognition established in the broader field of values in technology (Friedman et al. 2013; Sengers et al. 2005; DiSalvo 2012).”