HCI as heterodoxy: Technologies of identity and the queering of interaction with computers

236 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Toward Gender-Inclusive Coreference Resolution (2019, background): “Much inspiration here may come from third wave feminism and queer theory [De Lauretis 1990; Jagose 1996], and perhaps more closely the recent movement within Human Computer Interaction toward Queering HCI [Light 2011] and Feminist HCI [Bardzell and Churchill 2011].”
Social Justice-Oriented Interaction Design: Outlining Key Design Strategies and Commitments (2016, background): “Arguments about healthy conflict align well with prior scholarship on conflict, politics, and deliberation within HCI and beyond [30, 83, 91].”
Human-Computer Insurrection: Notes on an Anarchist HCI (2019, background): “There are myriad other movements: queer HCI [92], postcapitalist HCI [47], and anti-oppressive design [136], each providing their own critiques ofHCI’s dominant "technochauvinism" [29] and neoliberal ideology.”
Adhering, Steering, and Queering: Treatment of Gender in Natural Language Generation (2020, background): “For Light [42] and other HCI scholars [66], queer-ing is an alternative to the traditional conservatism of HCI and its focus on user ‘needs’ which perpetuate the status quo.”