Values as lived experience: evolving value sensitive design in support of value discovery

By C. L. Dantec, Erika Shehan Poole, Susan Wyche. 2009

372 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science, Human-Computer Interaction

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Timnit Gebru
2. Aimee van Wynsberghe
3. Emily M. Bender
4. Nitin Kohli

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Angelina McMillan-Major
2. Alan Borning
3. Michael J. Muller
4. Joshua A. Kroll
5. Timnit Gebru
6. Emily M. Bender
7. Irina Shklovski
8. Deirdre K. Mulligan

In Human-Computer Interaction

1. Alan Borning
2. Michael J. Muller
3. Angelina McMillan-Major
4. Aimee van Wynsberghe
5. Deirdre K. Mulligan
6. Richmond Y. Wong

Citations in the corpus

• This Thing Called Fairness (2019, background): “Instead, values are seen as instantiated through specific situated practices [67, 73, 92].”
• The Dark (Patterns) Side of UX Design (2018, background): “VSD has been critiqued for its inadequate guidance in informing value classifications, selecting appropriate empirical instruments, and ordering of the design process [48], however there has been sustained interest in finding ways to build value-discovery and action into the design process [13, 44].”
• Next steps for value sensitive design (2012, background): “Le Dantec et al. [48] raise a similar concern about what they view as an inappropriately privileged and prescriptive role for the list of values in the 2003 VSD paper [28].”
• Leakiness and creepiness in app space: perceptions of privacy and mobile app use (2014, background): “As our interview and survey respondents were able to articulate, their values and the values implicit in the design and behavior of certain smartphone apps were not well aligned [21].”
• On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜 (2021, background): “All of these approaches take time and are most valuable when applied early in the development process as part of a conceptual investigation of values and harms rather than as a post-hoc discovery of risks [72].”
• Designing Robots for Care: Care Centered Value-Sensitive Design (2013, background): “Because of this, Le Dantec et al. suggest a way in which the methodology of VSD may be strengthened, through an uncovering of values in situ or discovering values through experiencing the practice (Le Dantec et al. 2009).”