Big five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior.
By S. Paunonen, M. Ashton. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001
1,128 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/069cbfe798d1ee326dc4e4c0021b320900db3b44
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Ruth A. Baer
- B. Roberts
- K. V. Petrides
- C. Soto
- Eiko I. Fried
- James C. Kaufman
- Paul J Silvia
- R. McCrae
Citations in the corpus
- Conscientiousness and health-related behaviors: a meta-analysis of the leading behavioral contributors to mortality. (2004, background): “…have investigators moved to a more deliberate and systematic assessment of conscientiousness to take advantage of the well-known increment in validity that is gained by using more specific levels of measurement (e.g., Ashton, 1998; Mershon & Gorsuch, 1988; Paunonen, 1998; Paunonen & Ashton, 2001).”
- An Investigation of Character Strengths in Relation to the Academic Success of College Students (2009, result): “…Research, 2009, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 52-69 57 such an analysis will facilitate comparisons to other studies which have examined the multiple correlation of personality traits regressed on collegiate GPA (e.g., Lounsbury, Huffstetler, et al., 2005; Paunonen & Ashton, 2001; Paunonen & Nicol, 2001).”
- Personality Characteristics and the Decision to Become and Stay Self-Employed (2011, neutral): “In contrast, Paunonen and Ashton (2001) suggest that risk attitudes form a separate dimension of personality outside of the Big Five.”
- Personality Testing and Industrial–Organizational Psychology: Reflections, Progress, and Prospects (2008, result): “Other research also supports higher or more interpretable predictive validity for narrower facets than for broader factors of personality (Ashton, 1998; Mershon & Gorsuch, 1988; Paunonen, 1998; Paunonen & Ashton, 2001; Schneider, Hough, & Dunnette, 1996).”
- Personality characteristics and the decisions to become and stay self-employed (2013, neutral): “…compound personality characteristic reflected by a specific combination of scores within the Big Five personality construct (see, e.g., Nicholson et al. 2005), others suggest that risk tolerance forms a separate dimension of personality outside of the Big Five (see, e.g., Paunonen and Ashton 2001).”
- A motivated action theory account of goal orientation. (2005, background): “The predictable result of this perspective is that personality variables are rarely able to predict individual differences in behavior to any substantial extent (Funder, 2001; Paunonen & Ashton, 2001; Ross & Nisbett, 1991).”
- Gratitude, forgivingness, and well-being in adulthood: Tests of moderation and incremental prediction (2011, background): “These findings cohere with the frequent suggestion that specific trait measures have incremental value over broader domain measures (Paunonen, 1998 ; Paunonen & Ashton, 2001 ; Paunonen, Rothstein, & Jackson, 1999 ).”
- Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and Narcissism in the Five-Factor Model and the HEXACO model of personality structure (2005, background): “This finding illustrates the explanatory value that can be derived from the measurement of lower-level traits in the personality hierarchy (e.g., Paunonen & Ashton, 2001).”
- Broad versus narrow personality measures and the prediction of behaviour across cultures (2003, methodology): “Our criteria in this study consisted of several variables measured by the Behaviour Report Form (Paunonen, 1998, 2003; Paunonen & Ashton, 2001a).”
- Attitudes Toward Immigration: The Role of Personal Predispositions (2016, background): “Although we consider the SES variables to be mainly endogenous to personality (Duckworth & Seligman, 2005; Poropat, 2009), the opposite may also be the case (i.e., the SES variables may influence personality development) (Borghans, Duckworth, Heckman, & Weel, 2008; Paunonen & Ashton, 2001).”
- Beauty Is Not Simplicity: An Analysis of Mathematicians' Proof Appraisals (2015, positive): “…predict, among other things, life satisfaction (Boyce, Wood, & Powdthavee, 2013), perceived well-being (Hayes & Joseph, 2003), job performance (Paunonen & Ashton, 2001), drug consumption (Paunonen & Ashton, 2001), frequency of group conversations in day-to-day life (Mehl, Gosling, &…”
- Much Ado About Grit: A Meta-Analytic Synthesis of the Grit Literature (2017, background): “However, facets are often better predictors than broad traits (e.g., Paunonen & Ashton, 2001), and substantial differences between the grit facets to predict important criteria might suggest that this scoring strategy should be revisited.”
- Personality Psychology and Economics (2011, neutral): “Virtually all methods of estimating time preference assume that respondents are equally numerate, but Peters et al. (2006) show that this assumption is often untrue.”