In the heat of the sequence: Interactional features preceding walkouts from argumentative talk

By Ian Dersley, A. Wootton. Language in society, 2001

85 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/06489b630c987bb5c6e1fa62f33bdd9fb21ee794

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Mathias Broth
2. Irene Koshik
3. Lorenza Mondada
4. Numa Markee
5. Steve Walsh
6. Maurice Nevile
7. Arnulf Deppermann
8. Olcay Sert

In Language and Linguistics

1. Mathias Broth
2. Lorenza Mondada
3. Irene Koshik
4. Numa Markee
5. T. Koole
6. Arnulf Deppermann
7. Steve Walsh
8. Maurice Nevile

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Irene Koshik
2. Lorenza Mondada

Citations in the corpus

• Wh-questions used as challenges (2003, background): “See Dersley and Wootton (2001), who assert that ‘complaints [against co-present par- ties] . . . have the capacity to foster subsequent opposition among the parties involved’ and that ‘the common response to a complaint is a denial’ (p. 612).”
• Walking away: The embodied achievement of activity closings in mobile interaction (2013, background): “Of course, Richard’s deviant behaviour may be designed to achieve something in particular, such as ‘‘doing being annoyed’’ (cf. Dersley and Wootton, 2001; Llewellyn and Butler, 2011 on ‘‘walk-outs’’).”