Is There an Elephant in Entrepreneurship? Blind Assumptions in Theory Development
By William B. Gartner. 2001
567 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/063086c836418e9f5095de48e75b806ac7bc75fd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Jeffery S. McMullen
- Dimo Dimov
- Per Davidsson
- Robert A. Baron
- Friederike Welter
- Keith M. Hmieleski
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Denis A. Grégoire
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Jeffery S. McMullen
- Per Davidsson
- Dean A. Shepherd
- Dimo Dimov
- Melissa S. Cardon
- Joakim Wincent
- Denis A. Grégoire
- David B. Audretsch
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Jeffery S. McMullen
- Per Davidsson
- Keith M. Hmieleski
- Melissa S. Cardon
- Robert A. Baron
- Friederike Welter
- David B. Audretsch
- Joakim Wincent
Citations in the corpus
- Academic entrepreneurship (re)defined: significance and implications for the scholarship of higher education (2010, background): “However, the study of entrepreneurship has been hindered by a lack of scholarly consensus on the meaning of entrepreneurship (Gartner 2001), and by the highly varied influences of a multitude of otherwise disconnected social science disciplines.”
- Regulatory focus and new venture performance: A study of entrepreneurial opportunity exploitation under conditions of risk versus uncertainty (2008, background): “This fragmented approach has limited the development of more comprehensive theory within the fi eld of entrepreneurship (Gartner, 2001).”
- Enacting entrepreneurship as social value creation (2011, background): “In several ways, we can see what Gartner (2001) calls the unstated assumptions about growth, in effect that it is only economic growth that matters.”
- Can Entrepreneurship Be Taught? (2006, background): “The academic study of entrepreneurship has been described as "a broad label under which a hodgepodge of research is housed" (Shane and Venkataraman, p. 217) and a "cacophony of results and ideas" (Gartner, 2001, p. 27).”
- Advancing a Framework for Coherent Research on Women's Entrepreneurship (2007, background): “The various topics in the entrepreneurship field do not constitute a congruous whole” (Gartner, 2001, p. 34).”
- Pathways to Successful Entrepreneurship: Parenting, Personality, Early Entrepreneurial Competence, and Interests. (2004, background): “Much more difficult to answer is the question of who entrepreneurs are and how they become what they are (Gartner, 2001; Hisrich, 1990).”
- Mixed methods studies in entrepreneurship research: Applications and contributions (2012, background): “Several authors defend the use of a variety of methods in entrepreneurship research, using quantitative and qualitative approaches (Gartner 2001; Ucbasaran, Westhead, and Wright 2001; Brush et al. 2003).”
- Reflections on the 2010 AMR Decade Award: Delivering on the Promise of Entrepreneurship As a Field of Research (2012, background): “Moreover, other authors have said that our effort has led to better connected and specified explanations for entrepreneurship and has facilitated the development of the field’s legitimacy (Busenitz et al., 2003; Davidsson, Delmar, & Wiklund, 2002; Gartner, 2001).”
- Determinants of Entrepreneurial Intent: A Meta–Analytic Test and Integration of Competing Models (2012, methodology): “Theory driven meta-analysis provides a method to address unresolved research questions and reach “a sense of theoretical clarity” (Gartner, 2001, p. 28) of the relationships that entrepreneurship researchers strive to understand.”