When is getting there half the fun? Modeling the liking for travel - eScholarship
By D. Ory, Patricia L. Mokhtarian. 2005
359 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, Transportation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/061ffb10dfd3ba3333222f0df98ef1860e0db4c2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- J. De Vos
- P. Singleton
- Jing Zhu
- Yingling Fan
- Frank Witlox
- Oliver Smith
- Tim Schwanen
- Veronique Van Acker
In Sociology and Political Science
- J. De Vos
- Frank Witlox
- Oliver Smith
- Patricia L. Mokhtarian
- S. Handy
- Yingling Fan
- Jing Zhu
- Olga Lorenz
In Transportation
- J. De Vos
- P. Singleton
- Frank Witlox
- Tim Schwanen
- Patricia L. Mokhtarian
- Yingling Fan
- Jing Zhu
- Veronique Van Acker
Citations in the corpus
- Travel satisfaction revisited : on the pivotal role of travel satisfaction in conceptualizing a travel behavior process (2017, background): “However, there are studies indicating that travel can offer a positive utility in its own right (Mokhtarian and Salomon, 2001; Mokhtarian et al., 2015; Ory and Mokhtarian, 2005).”
- Commute well-being differences by mode: Evidence from Portland, Oregon, USA (2017, methodology): “Borrowed measures included questions on travel well-being (Ettema et al., 2011) and attitudes and preferences about travel (Ory and Mokhtarian, 2005).”
- Does commuting matter to subjective well-being? (2018, background): “2009) and experience less disutility of commuting (Ory and Mokhtarian 2005).”
- Autonomous Driving: Technical, Legal and Social Aspects (2016, background): “The nomenclature distinguishes “driver only” and “assisted” systems from systems with “partial automation” (the system takes over lateral and longitudinal control in certain situations), “high automation” (the driver does not need to continuously monitor the system) and “full automation” (the system”
- The effect of social comparisons on commute well-being (2011, background): “People may enjoy their commute for a number of reasons; they may consider their commute as their private time or as a useful transition between work and home (see, for example, Ory and Mokhtarian, 2005).”
- Mood and mode: does how we travel affect how we feel? (2014, background): “On the other hand, Ory and Mokhtarian (2005) do not find bus or rail use for the commute, or commute duration, to be significant in predicting individuals’ overall liking for travel, and Abou-Zeid (2009, as cited by De Vos et al. 2013) finds transit users are happier with their commutes than auto…”
- Commuting and wellbeing: a critical overview of the literature with implications for policy and future research (2019, methodology): “They have used the concept of ‘liking’ both for travel in general and for modes specifically (Ory and Mokhtarian, 2005).”
- From attitude to satisfaction: introducing the travel mode choice cycle (2021, neutral): “…behaviour and attitudes, while others have shown that certain personality traits can in fl uence travel mode choice, travel satisfaction, and travel attitudes (Abou-Zeid & Ben-Akiva, 2011; Johansson, Heldt, & Johansson, 2006; Ory & Mokhtarian, 2005, 2009; Van Acker, Mokhtarian, & Witlox, 2011).”