Acceptability of single and combined transport policy measures: The importance of environmental and policy specific beliefs

307 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Attitudes towards road pricing and environmental taxation among US and UK students (2013, background): “Distributional fairness relates to the perceived fairness of the distribution of the costs and benefits within society, for example whether some population groups might be disadvantaged compared to others (Eriksson et al, 2008; Schuitema et al, 2010).”
Part II: Policy instruments for sustainable road transport (2010, unknown): “In 1964 the Preliminary Urban Plan, later to become the Curitiba Master Plan, was commissioned by the public administration of Curitiba (Rabinovitch, 1996). While the integration of land use and transport policy has since become widely accepted, the Curitiba Master Plan’s integration of these princi”
Individual Factors Influencing Acceptability for Environmental Policies: A Review and Research Agenda (2020, background): “In the transport domain, pull measures are perceived as more effective than push measures or packages that combine pull and push measures, and are also perceived as more acceptable [43].”
Explaining differences in acceptability before and acceptance after the implementation of a congestion charge in Stockholm (2010, background): “Both acceptability and acceptance of road pricing schemes reflect an attitude towards these schemes (e.g., Bamberg and Rölle, 2003; Eriksson et al., 2006, 2008; Gärling et al., 2008; Jakobsson et al., 2000; Schade and Schlag, 2000).”