The Wages of Failure: Executive Compensation at Bear Stearns and Lehman 2000-2008
By L. Bebchuk, Alma Cohen, Holger Spamann. 2009
388 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/05ed1bbf2b2bf8150d1e1f8e59adf69887e3322a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Alex Edmans
- Xavier Gabaix
- Sanjai Bhagat
- Brian J. Bolton
- Tomasz Sadzik
- Yuliy Sannikov
- Suleyman Basak
- Zhiguo He
Citations in the corpus
- Dynamic CEO Compensation (2012, methodology): “Following on from Theorem 4, we assume that a t = a 8 t. Short-termism is broadly de ned to encompass any action that increases current returns at the expense of future returns. This de nition includes real decisions such as scrapping positiveNPV investments (see, e.g., Stein (1988)) or taking negat”
- Financial crisis and bank executive incentive compensation (2014, background): “In an insightful recent paper, Bebchuk et al. (2010) study the compensation structure of the top executives in Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers and conclude, “…given the structure of executives' payoffs, the possibility that risk-taking decisions were influenced by incentives should not be…”
- Financial Expertise of the Board, Risk Taking, and Performance: Evidence from Bank Holding Companies (2014, unknown): “For instance, a fair amount of attention has been given to the incentives of bank management in the run-up to and during the 2007–2008 financial crisis (see Fahlenbrach and Stulz (2011), Bebchuk, Cohen, and Spamann (2010), and Cornett, McNutt, and Tehranian (2010)).”