Tolerance to herbivory in woody vs. herbaceous plants

By E. Haukioja, J. Koricheva. Evolutionary Ecology, 2000

219 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0554f4101d40c9440e104d765322bcbfa1a8c286

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Seaweed-herbivore interactions at a small scale: direct tests of feeding deterrence by filamentous algae (2006, methodology): “In terrestrial systems, comparisons have often been drawn between woody and herbaceous plants, with large, long-lived and apparent trees contrasting to smaller, fast-growing herbs with short, opportunistic life histories (Feeny 1976, Haukioja & Koricheva 2000).”
Resistance and tolerance in Populus tremuloides: genetic variation, costs, and environmental dependency (2007, background): “means that even with strong resistance, some level of herbivore damage is likely (Haukioja and Koricheva 2000), favoring the evolution of tolerance mechanisms.”
Invasive ecotypes tolerate herbivory more effectively than native ecotypes of the Chinese tallow tree Sapium sebiferum (2004, background): “Long-lived perennial plants often replace tissues lost to herbivory damage over several growing seasons (Hendrix 1988; Sacchi & Conner 1999; Haukioja & Koricheva 2000) suggesting that Chinese ecotypes may compensate for damage with time.”
Foliar habit, tolerance to defoliation and their link to carbon and nitrogen storage (2014, background): “…to complete and repeated defoliation compared to evergreen species, is consistent with the view of herbivory tolerance as the selected mechanism under frequent, intense and often unpredictable defoliations (van der Meijden, Wijn & Verkaar 1988; Rosenthal & Kotanen 1994; Haukioja & Koricheva 2000).”
Facing herbivory as you grow up: the ontogeny of resistance in plants. (2005, background): “Subsequently, as the shoot:root ratio increases with plant growth, resources become more available for storage and defense [ 18 ].”
Variation in tolerance to herbivory is mediated by differences in biomass allocation in aspen (2007, methodology): “…in examining how potential mechanisms of tolerance are influenced by genetic and environmental factors in a woody species, since the majority of tolerance studies to date have utilized herbaceous species and their conclusions may not pertain to trees (Haukioja & Koricheva 2000; Tiffin 2000).”
A meta-analysis of tradeoffs between plant tolerance and resistance to herbivores: combining the evidence from ecological and agricultural studies (2006, background): “Despite these difficulties, studies assessing the relationship between resistance and tolerance in long-lived plants should be encouraged, since tolerance of herbivory may be a very important defense strategy in such plants; their susceptibility to herbivory is high due to their large size and long ”
Effects of defoliation by horse chestnut leafminer (Cameraria ohridella) on reproduction in Aesculus hippocastanum (2003, background): “hippocastanum trees should therefore react to current bad conditions, such as strong herbivore pressure, by first ensuring their own survival and growth at the cost of reducing the current allocation of resources to reproduction (Crawley 1997; Haukioja and Koricheva 2000).”
Impact of plant invasions on local arthropod communities: a meta‐analysis (2014, background): “Herbaceous plants allocate about 12–46 times more biomass to leaves than woody plants (Haukioja & Koricheva 2000), providing more resources to herbivores (Kimmins 2004).”