Facing herbivory as you grow up: the ontogeny of resistance in plants.

By K. Boege, R. Marquis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2005

818 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/b825883ae2a65ed96b1d7d53da7885bb4eb892e7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. Jianwen Zou
2. A. Hampe
3. L. Comita
4. Jianqing Ding
5. G. Wheeler
6. K. Ma
7. R. Petit
8. Juli Carrillo

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. L. Comita
2. Jianwen Zou
3. A. Hampe
4. K. Ma
5. R. Petit
6. Jianqing Ding
7. G. Wheeler
8. Yan Zhu

In Plant Science

1. Jianwen Zou
2. Jianqing Ding
3. G. Wheeler
4. L. Comita
5. Juli Carrillo
6. A. Hampe
7. R. Petit
8. E. Siemann

Citations in the corpus

• Conspecific and phylogenetic density‐dependent survival differs across life stages in a tropical forest (2015, background): “In particular, natural enemy attack may have a larger impact at earlier compared to later stages due to ontogenetic shifts in plant defence and tolerance (Boege & Marquis 2005).”
• Climate‐driven change in plant–insect interactions along elevation gradients (2014, background): “Although we acknowledge that herbivory rates are likely to vary with ontogeny (Boege & Marquis 2005), monitoring herbivory on seedlings is valuable because this lifestage is key for community assembly and therefore herbivore impact is predicted to be stronger.”
• Ontogenetic variation in light requirements of juvenile rainforest evergreens (2008, background): “Herbivore pressure has been shown to significantly influence light requirements (DeWalt, Denslow & Ickes 2004); if increasing size makes plants more attractive to vertebrate herbivores ( Boege & Marquis 2005 ), their impact could contribute to ontogenetic increases in the MLRs of species with shortl”
• Some Evolutionary Consequences of Being a Tree (2006, background): “Although this is not unique to trees, the heterogeneity of selection pressures is exacerbated by trees’ longevity and by the diversity of organisms with whom they are interacting (Boege & Marquis 2005, Linhart & Grant 1996).”
• The resource availability hypothesis revisited: a meta‐analysis (2011, background): “The reason for this is unclear, however, again, it may be easier to detect differences in defences if seedlings invest more than other age classes because of the potentially devastating effects of herbivory (Barton & Koricheva 2010; but see Boege & Marquis 2005).”
• Resource allocation to defence and growth are driven by different responses to generalist and specialist herbivory in an invasive plant (2010, background): “As plant ontogeny can affect the expression of resistance to herbivore damage as plants develop from seeds to seedlings, juveniles and mature stages (Boege & Marquis 2005), we included four different ages (years) of plants in our tests.”
• Regeneration: an overlooked aspect of trait‐based plant community assembly models (2016, background): “For example, different leaf traits may enable response to herbivory through escape (e.g. phenology of seed or leaf production), defence (e.g. secondary metabolites) or tolerance (e.g. photosynthetic activity) (Boege & Marquis 2005).”
• Adaptations of quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) for defense against herbivores (2013, background): “As they develop, plants are exposed to different types and amounts of herbivory, and experience different resource and physical constrain ts on strategies to counter herbivory (Boege and Marquis, 2005 ).”
• Does having multiple partners weaken the benefits of facultative mutualism? A test with cacti and cactus‐tending ants (2007, background): “Susceptibility to enemies can change dramatically throughout plant development (Fenner et al. 1999, Warner and Cushman 2002, Boege and Marquis 2005), suggesting that plant defense traits, including biotic defense, should also be stage-dependent.”
• Costs of constitutive and herbivore‐induced chemical defences in pine trees emerge only under low nutrient availability (2011, background): “Vegetative costs associated with chemical defences have also been shown to be greatest in early stages, as this is when root growth is prioritized and structural defences such as resin ducts must be constructed (Boege & Marquis 2005; Orians et al. 2010).”
• Plant apparency, an overlooked driver of associational resistance to insect herbivory (2013, background): “As plant resistance to herbivores also changes with plant ontogeny (Boege & Marquis 2005; Barton & Koricheva 2010; Boege, Barton & Dirzo 2011), different mechanisms may also be involved in the diversity–resistance relationship in seedlings and in adult trees.”