Understanding the Time-Squeeze
By M. Clarkberg, P. Moen. 2001
191 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0549bc330e076287eadc5426b0f7255b28da145d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
- Youngjoo Cha
- Stephen A. Sweet
- Kim A. Weeden
- P. Moen
- Enrique Fernández-Macías
- David Grusky
- Thijs Bol
- Sarah Thébaud
Citations in the corpus
- Long Work Hours, Part-Time Work, and Trends in the Gender Gap in Pay, the Motherhood Wage Penalty, and the Fatherhood Wage Premium (2016, background): “…evidence that many workers put in long work hours less out of preference than out of the fear that they will incur career penalties if they do not (Clarkberg and Moen 2001; see also Reid 2015), and given the association between long work hours and productivity may be more illusory than real, the…”
- From ‘work–family’ to ‘flexible careers’ (2004, background): “…& Godbey, 1997; Schor, 1991), when the couple is considered as a social unit there is little doubt that work hours — the combined efforts of the husband and the wife — have risen in dramatic ways over the past three decades (Clarkberg & Merola, 2003; Clarkberg & Moen, 2001; Jacobs & Gerson, 2001).”
- Informal Caregiving and Retirement Timing among Men and Women (2002, background): “The same pattern holds true earlier in the life coursewhen informal care recipients in the form of infants enter families: Women tend to scale back on their paid work commitments, whereas men’s hours at work actually increase (Clarkberg & Moen, 2001).”