Show me the money! An empirical analysis of mentoring outcomes for women in academia

By M. Gardiner, M. Tiggemann, Hugh Kearns, K. Marshall. 2007

225 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Gender Studies, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04ea8a4f18eb1ccd62308735e14fa90b8c037a17

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Stine Thidemann Faber
2. Amani Bell
3. Evanthia Kalpazidou Schmidt

In Social Psychology

1. Stine Thidemann Faber
2. Evanthia Kalpazidou Schmidt

Citations in the corpus

• Looking for Professor Right: mentee selection of mentors in a formal mentoring program (2011, background): “Additional benefits for mentees can include higher rates of retention and promotion, higher success rates in receiving external research grants, higher publication rates and better perceptions of themselves as academics ( Gardiner et al. 2007 ).”
• Female Leadership Raises Aspirations and Educational Attainment for Girls: A Policy Experiment in India (2012, unknown): “Further, much of the existing evidence comes from observational studies, where beliefs or actions of individuals exposed to different role models are compared (19–22), or from laboratory or short-term schoolbased experiments, where individuals are exposed to different role models either in person or”
• Benefits of Peer Mentoring to Mentors, Female Mentees and Higher Education Institutions (2016, background): “Especially, lack of networking opportunities and the “research productivity cycle” impede women’s careers (Gardiner et al., 2007, p. 426).”