Developmental Financial Institutions as Catalysts of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies

By Gerard George, G. Prabhu. 2000

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/04d3480c3314bf9b18c83b89fc03598b2324fcf3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Ownership and the Internationalization of Small Firms (2005, background): “They also monitor management decisions (Zahra, Neubaum, & Huse, 2000) and help firms make better strategic decisions (George & Prabhu, 2000; Thomsen & Pedersen 2000).”
The development of entrepreneurship in China (2008, background): “…theories, such as agency theory (Dharwadkar et al., 2000), transaction cost economics (Boisot & Child, 1988; Ramamurti, 2000), stakeholder theory (George & Prabhu, 2000), and neoinstitutional perspective (Boisot & Child, 1996; Nee, 1992) have been mainly employed as the theoretical perspectives…”
Reinventing strategies for emerging markets: beyond the transnational model (2004, background): “In addition, firms can also benefit from effectively working with and supporting financial and other institutions that facilitate value creation and entrepreneurship in emerging economies (George and Prabhu, 2000).”
Barriers and public policies affecting the international expansion of Latin American SMEs: Evidence from Brazil, Colombia, and Peru (2016, background): “For instance, George and Prabhu (2000) showed a link between government-oriented developmental ﬁ nancial institutions and value creation and entrepreneurship in emerging economies.”
Home country institutions and the internationalization of state owned enterprises: A cross-country analysis (2016, background): “We thank an anonymous reviewer for reminding us of this. under-development by enabling funding of key industrialization or infrastructure projects (George & Prabhu, 2000), or even by guiding the process of market driven economic development, as is the case in Singapore and China (Redding & Witt,…”
International Entrepreneurship: The Current Status of the Field and Future Research Agenda (2017, background): “Recent theoretical work suggests that certain types of institutions provide opportunities for firms to develop their networks and attract international partnerships for expansion (George & Prabhu 2000).”
Explaining entrepreneurial intentions of university students: a cross‐cultural study (2009, background): “This view is seconded by others who point to the important role of developmental financial institutions in fostering entrepreneurship in emerging economies (George and Prabhu, 2000) and of venture capitalist in different economic contexts (Bruton and Ahlstrom, 2003).”
Diversified Business Groups and Corporate Refocusing in Emerging Economies (2005, background): “For example, the World Bank has a subsidiary DFI called the International Financial Corporation, which has an $8 billion budget to invest in privatization programs (George & Prabhu, 2000).”
The role of family ownership in international entrepreneurship: exploring nonlinear effects (2012, background): “The main ones are favourable institutional factors (George and Prabhu 2000), intensity of global competition (Coviello and Munro 1995) and domestic market saturation (Karagozoglu and Lindell 1998).”
Latin America Management Research: Review, Synthesis, and Extension (2011, background): “Governance in the context of privatization has also been a rich area for conceptual development (Dharwadkar, George, & Brandes, 2000; George & Prabhu, 2000; Ramamurti, 2000; Zahra, Ireland, Gutierrez, & Hitt, 2000).”
A framework for comparing entrepreneurship processes across nations (2005, background): “Many entrepreneurs in developing and emerging economies face ecologies that provide neither specialized resources and institutional support nor good general-purpose financial, educational, political or legal infrastructure (George and Prabhu, 2000).”
Institutional Investors and Institutional Environment: A Comparative Analysis and Review (2010, background): “In general, however, the government retains a significant, long-term stake in firms that have been privatized, or it maintains control through governance devices, political power, or some combination of the above (George and Prabhu, 2000).”
Leviathan as a Minority Shareholder: Firm-Level Implications of State Equity Purchases (2013, background): “Following this argument is the view that state capital can help boost entrepreneurial activity by stimulating investments in projects that would otherwise remain unfunded (George & Prabhu, 2000; Mazzucato, 2011).”