The Power of Shame and the Rationality of Trust

137 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Other Regarding Preferences: A Selective Survey of Experimental Results (2012, unknown): “Tadelis (2007) argues that “shame” rather than “guilt” drives the results reported in dictator games, constructing a model designed to distinguish between the two concepts and reporting an experiment based on the trust game to support his hypothesis.”
Dynamic psychological games (2009, background): “48For example, the terminal information partition is crucial in Battigalli and Dufwenbergs [8] model of guilt from blame and Tadelis[77] analysis of shame in a Trust Game.”
Social Image and the 50-50 Norm: A Theoretical and Experimental Analysis of Audience Effects (2009, background): “Recent contributions in that general area include Ellingsen and Johannesson (2008), Tadelis (2007), and Manning (2007).”
Do people care about social context? Framing effects in dictator games (2012, unknown): “…(Cappelen et al. 2007). the recipient is informed that small gift could have come about by chance—due to circumstances beyond their control; see also Tadelis (2008).9 However, the literature is less clear when it comes to the importance of recipient awareness versus experimenter observation and…”