Predication

By Walter Kintsch. 2001

663 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

Citations in the corpus

A Structured Vector Space Model for Word Meaning in Context (2008, methodology): “There have been several approaches in the literature (Smolensky, 1990; Sch ¨ utze, 1998; Kintsch, 2001; McDonald and Brew, 2004; Mitchell and La-pata, 2008) that compute meaning in context from lemma vectors.”
Domain and Function: A Dual-Space Model of Semantic Relations and Compositions (2012, background): “Kintsch (2001) proposes a variation of additive composition in which c is the sum of a, b, and selected neighbours ni of a and b, c = a+b+ ∑ i ni.”
Latent semantic analysis (2004, background): “• LSA can even interpret metaphors like, “My lawyer is a shark” (see Kintsch, 2001).”
The Explicit Syntax of Implicit Arguments (2010, background): “2 Notice, incidentally, that the contrasts in (9)–(11) provide a compelling argument against the view that obligatory control (OC) reduces to predication (Bach 1979, Williams 1980, Chierchia 1984, 1989, Dowty 1985, Clark 1990).”
Comprehension of reflexive and personal pronouns in children with autism: A syntactic or pragmatic deficit? (2012, background): “First, should the existence of this linear rule be interpreted to mean that the child with autism is completely missing the hierarchical rule of c-command? Second, why do our participants (with the exception of three children, as reported earlier) interpret CP sentences correctly?10 C-command is a s”
Depictive secondary predicates in crosslinguistic perspective (2004, background): “The predicative relation between controller and depictive is represented by co-indexing, just like the relation between the subject and the main predicate (an analysis pioneered by Williams 1980).”
Vector Space Models of Word Meaning and Phrase Meaning: A Survey (2012, background): “The vector is then modified to fit a particular sentence context (Landauer and Dumais 1997; Kintsch 2001; Mitchell and Lapata 2008; Erk and Padó 2008; Thater et al. 2009, 2010, 2011; Van de Cruys et al. 2011).”
Distributional Models of Word Meaning (2018, background): “The simplest form of vector combination is vector addition (Landauer & Dumais 1997) or some extension thereof (Kintsch 2001).”
What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? (2015, methodology): “…within the internal representation of context, approximating to a “bag of words” (quantified using measures like latent semantic analysis, Kintsch, 2001; Landauer & Dumais, 1997; Landauer, Foltz, & Laham, 1998), could interact with lexico-semantic relationships stored within longterm…”
A Comparison of Vector-based Representations for Semantic Composition (2012, methodology): “Assuming that composition is a linear function of the Cartesian product of u and v allows to specify additive models which are by far the most common method of vector combination in the literature (Landauer and Dumais, 1997; Foltz et al., 1998; Kintsch, 2001).”
Representing words as regions in vector space (2009, background): “Kintsch (2001) and Mitchell and Lapata (2008) combine the target’s type vector with that of a single word in the target’s syntactic context.”
Distributional semantics in linguistic and cognitive research (2008, methodology): “…polysemy in verbs: contextualized distributional approach to argument seman-tics’) apply the DH within the theory of the Generative Lexicon (GL; Pustejovsky 1995, 2001), and provide interesting examples of the advantages of using the DH in close cooperation with a solid theory of lexical semantics.”
The Configurational Matrix (2002, methodology): “requires c-command (Williams 1980), as shown by the Dutch depictives below.”