Distributional semantics in linguistic and cognitive research
By Alessandro Lenci, J. Littell. 2008
315 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/76f826f04895f2194e967586954d1f58bc980153
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Simon Ostermann
- Michael Roth
- Ashutosh Modi
- Stefan Thater
- Manfred Pinkal
- Gregor Wiedemann
- Hannah Schmid-Petri
- Oliver Watts
Citations in the corpus
- Unsupervised learning for text-to-speech synthesis (2013, methodology): “For example, Li and McCallum (2005) apply Brown clusters (as one of their unsupervised features) once again to POS tagging, and in Koo et al.”
- Understanding Natural Language Understanding Systems. A Critical Analysis (2023, background): “Therefore, linguistic co-occurrences, like the ones used by foundation models, do shape our meanings, alongside other types of multimodal experiences (Lenci 2008, Lupyan and Lewis 2019).”
- Gender stereotypes are reflected in the distributional structure of 25 languages (2019, methodology): “This relationship was not reliable for the Wikipedia corpus (r(20) = −0.”
- Applying LDA Topic Modeling in Communication Research: Toward a Valid and Reliable Methodology (2018, background): “However, by discarding word order, specific local context information on semantic relations between words is lost, which otherwise might help interpret deeper meanings and solve ambiguities (Lenci, 2008, p. 21).”
- SemEval-2018 Task 11: Machine Comprehension Using Commonsense Knowledge (2018, background): “Traditionally, Natural Language Understanding (NLU) systems have resolved ambiguities using information from the textual context (e.g. neighboring words and sentences), for example via distributional methods (Lenci, 2008).”