Gender, ethnicity and teaching evaluations: Evidence from mixed teaching teams

By N. Wagner, Matthias Rieger, Katherine Voorvelt. 2016

90 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/034cc08f1346bdcfd3d15187cf426667bbf208a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Lauren A. Rivera
2. András Tilcsik
3. Anne Boring
4. Wolfgang Stroebe

Citations in the corpus

• Scaling Down Inequality: Rating Scales, Gender Bias, and the Architecture of Evaluation (2019, background): “Instead, it contributes to a substantial gender gap based on stereotypes of brilliance that can harm women’s opportunities for hiring, promotion, and compensation (Baldwin and Blattner 2003; Murray 1984; Wagner et al. 2016).”
• Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching (2017, background): “Patients can evaluate doctors online and some medical centers 18 Two other recent articles studying SET scores in the context of Dutch universities also find evidence of gender biases, see Mengel et al. (2016) and Wagner et al. (2016). have decided to release the results of patient surveys.”