The future of infant categorization research: a process-oriented approach.

By Lisa M. Oakes, Kelly L. Madole. 2000

50 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

THE DEVELOPMENT OF OBJECT CATEGORIZATION IN YOUNG CHILDREN: HIERARCHICAL INCLUSIVENESS, AGE, PERCEPTUAL ATTRIBUTE, AND GROUP VERSUS INDIVIDUAL ANALYSES (2010, background): “In this vein, Oakes and Madole (2003) argued that older children recognize more and different shared attributes of objects and so more facilely shift their attention among attributes. More generally, as people gain more experience, they become capable of finer categorizations. Tanaka and Taylor (199”
The stability and flexibility of spatial categories. (2005, background): “What processes give rise to categories that are both stable and Xexible? In recent years, there has been a shift from viewing categories as static representations with inherent structures (e.g., Mandler, 1993; Mandler & McDonough, 1993; Mervis, 1985) toward viewing them as emergent products of cogni”
Representation of the Gender of Human Faces by Infants: A Preference for Female (2002, background): “…(Quinn and Eimas 1996a; Rakison and Butterworth 1998); and (iv) the mechanisms that enable the category representations of infants to develop into the knowledge-rich concepts of adults (eg Mandler 1992; Mareschal et al 2000; Oakes and Madole 2000; Quinn 2000d; Rakison and Poulin-Dubois 2001).”