Meta‐analyses of love scales: Do various love scales measure the same psychological constructs?

By M. Masuda. 2003

96 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Measuring love in romantic relationships: A meta-analysis (2011, methodology): “While the LAS was originally intended to measure attitudes towards love rather than love itself, some research suggests that some subscales of the LAS may be measuring the experience of love (Davies, Kirkpatrick, Levy, & O’Hearn, 1994, Fehr, 1994; Masuda, 2003).”
A brief history of social scientists’ attempts to measure passionate love (2012, background): “Today, the most commonly used scales of passionate love measures (see Graham & Christiansen, 2009; Masuda, 2003) are one that assesses people’s attitudes toward love (Hendrick & Hendrick’s Love Attitudes Scale) and two that directly assess people’s feelings of love, in and of itself (Hatfield and…”
Does a Long-Term Relationship Kill Romantic Love? (2009, methodology): “A recent meta-analysis (Masuda, 2003) of 33 studies, including both short and long-term relationships and various measures, found substantial correlations of romantic love with relationship satisfaction (weighted mean correlation .”
‘All you need is brand love’: a critical review and comprehensive conceptual framework for brand love (2019, background): “Within the general love literature, several theories have been proposed that include elaborate and multidimensional approaches (Masuda, 2003).”