Moving the Achievement Goal Approach One Step Forward: Toward a Systematic Examination of the Autonomous and Controlled Reasons Underlying Achievement Goals
By Maarten Vansteenkiste, W. Lens, A. Elliot, Bart Soenens, Athanasios Mouratidis. 2014
192 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/008436f0a0796fd130340bfbf3e617f77915ffdb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Social Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Performance-Approach Goal Effects Depend on How They Are Defined: Meta-Analytic Evidence From Multiple Educational Outcomes (2017, background): “The leading contender at this juncture is the goal complex model (Elliot & Thrash, 2001; Urdan, 2000; Vansteenkiste et al., 2014).”
- Different goals, different pathways to success: Performance-approach goals as direct and mastery-approach goals as indirect predictors of grades in mathematics (2018, unknown): “Second, we disregarded the various reasons underlying the pursuit of achievement goals (Senko & Tropiano, 2016; Vansteenkiste, Lens, Elliot, Soenens, & Mouratidis, 2014), as research has shown that achievement goals may be pursued for di ff erent reasons.”
- Achievement Goals, Reasons for Goal Pursuit, and Achievement Goal Complexes as Predictors of Beneficial Outcomes: Is the Influence of Goals Reducible to Reasons? (2017, unknown): “…from goals, and that the autonomous reasons connected to the achievement goals were found to be stronger (Gillet et al., 2015), more robust (Vansteenkiste et al., 2010a), and more important (Deci & Ryan, 2016) predictors of beneficial outcomes Vansteenkiste et al., 2014a, for a more nuanced view).”