B. Pjetursson

Oral Surgery · 2007–2015

A researcher in the Science corpus: 7 papers; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Oral Surgery — 7 citations into it
• Statistics and Probability — 7 citations into it

Whom B. Pjetursson trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Douglas G. Altman
2. T. Berglundh
3. Matthias Egger

Papers from B. Pjetursson's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers B. Pjetursson trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. (Health Technology Assessment)
2. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant dentistry reported in prospective longitudinal studies of at least 5 years. (Journal of Clinical Periodontology)
3. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. (Clinical Oral Implants Research)
4. Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables (British medical journal)
5. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: Fixed dental prostheses. (Clinical Oral Implants Research)
6. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
7. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS
8. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (British medical journal)
9. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (Health Technology Assessment)
10. Is the placebo powerless? An analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment. (New England Journal of Medicine)

Their papers

• All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). (2015) — 704 citations
• A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. (2012) — 936 citations
• Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years. (2012) — 987 citations
• A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of resin-bonded bridges after an observation period of at least 5 years (2008) — 978 citations
• A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. (2008) — 841 citations
• Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). (2007) — 807 citations
• A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: Fixed dental prostheses. (2007) — 700 citations