A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: Fixed dental prostheses.

By I. Sailer, B. Pjetursson, Marcel Zwahlen, C. Hämmerle. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2007

700 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

An overview of zirconia ceramics: basic properties and clinical applications. (2007, unknown): “A systematic review of the literature evaluated all-ceramic restorations survival rate in comparison with porcelain fused to metal and, inside all ceramic group, with zirconia ceramic restorations.(77,78) 5-years”
Current status of zirconia restoration. (2013, background): “Therefore, porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) restorations to make ‘‘metal-ceramic restorations’’ has been the ﬁrst choice of prostheses to satisfy requirements for esthetics, durability, and ﬁt to the abutments [1,2].”
All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs). (2015, background): “[2]Cagidiaco MC, García-Godoy F, Vichi A, Grandini S, Goracci C, Ferrari M.”
Trends in Computer-Aided Manufacturing in Prosthodontics: A Review of the Available Streams (2014, background): “Special emphasis is placed on the materials effect and accuracy.”