T. Hak
Statistics and Probability · 2008–2017
A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 4 researchers and is trusted by 5 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 13 citations into it
Whom T. Hak trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Who trusts T. Hak overall
Papers from T. Hak's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers T. Hak trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Interpretation of random effects meta-analyses (British medical journal)
- A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis (Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A,)
- Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (British medical journal)
- The case of the misleading funnel plot (British medical journal)
- Meta-Analysis in Stata: An Updated Collection from the Stata Journal
- Cognitive Interviewing. A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design (Quality of Life Research)
- Basics of meta‐analysis: I2 is not an absolute measure of heterogeneity (Research Synthesis Methods)
- Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes. (American Journal of Epidemiology)
- How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS
- Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)