S. Hurlbert

Statistics and Probability · 2004–2019

A researcher in the Science corpus: 5 papers; trusts 33 researchers and is trusted by 7 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom S. Hurlbert trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Ronald Christensen
  2. Douglas G. Altman
  3. Thorsten Dickhaus
  4. Yoav Benjamini
  5. G. Quinn
  6. Christopher R. Genovese
  7. R. Nickerson
  8. R. Wasserstein
  9. D. R. Cox
  10. James O. Berger

Who trusts S. Hurlbert overall

  1. P. Beninger
  2. Sander Greenland
  3. Mark Rubin
  4. Roger Mundry
  5. I. Boldina
  6. T. Wernberg
  7. Valentin Amrhein
  8. Z. Münzbergová
  9. M. Lajeunesse
  10. F. Sergio

Papers from S. Hurlbert's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers S. Hurlbert trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing
  2. The Design of Experiments
  3. Null hypothesis significance testing: a review of an old and continuing controversy. (Psychological methods)
  4. On the Problem of the Most Efficient Tests of Statistical Hypotheses
  5. Could Fisher, Jeffreys and Neyman Have Agreed on Testing?
  6. On the Mathematical Foundations of Theoretical Statistics
  7. Confusion Over Measures of Evidence (p's) Versus Errors (α's) in Classical Statistical Testing
  8. Severe Testing as a Basic Concept in a Neyman–Pearson Philosophy of Induction (British Journal for the Philosophy of Science)
  9. Testing Statistical Hypotheses
  10. First course in probability and statistics

Their papers