H. Thomas

Statistics and Probability · with Ciliska · 2010

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom H. Thomas trusts

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Matthias Egger (in Statistics and Probability)

Papers from H. Thomas's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers H. Thomas trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study. (Health Technology Assessment)
  2. Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (PLoS Medicine)
  3. Systematic reviews in health care: Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials. (British medical journal)
  4. Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study. (International Journal of Epidemiology)
  5. Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study (British medical journal)
  6. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
  7. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Supplements for Primary and Secondary Prevention: Mortality in Randomized Trials of Antioxidant
  8. CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (British medical journal)
  9. Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies. (Health Technology Assessment)
  10. Is the placebo powerless? An analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment. (New England Journal of Medicine)

Their papers