I. Petersen

Statistics and Probability · PLoS Medicine · 2007–2017

A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom I. Petersen trusts

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Hakan Demirtas (in Artificial Intelligence)
  2. Douglas G. Altman (in Statistics and Probability)

Papers from I. Petersen's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers I. Petersen trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. (The Lancet)
  2. Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment: enabling reuse for clinical research
  3. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals. (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews)
  4. Validation and validity of diagnoses in the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review (British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology)
  5. Validation studies of the health improvement network (THIN) database for pharmacoepidemiology research (Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety)
  6. Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines (PLoS Medicine)
  7. Multiple imputation using chained equations: Issues and guidance for practice (Statistics in Medicine)
  8. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. (Bulletin of the World Health Organization)
  9. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (British medical journal)
  10. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (Annals of Internal Medicine [serial online])

Their papers