Leah Stokes

Economics and Econometrics · 2013–2020

A researcher in the Science corpus: 5 papers; trusts 23 researchers and is trusted by 5 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Economics and Econometrics — 42 citations into it; #11,881 of 23,481 by trust here, #16,755 by citations
• Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment — 24 citations into it
• Sociology and Political Science — 22 citations into it; #7,399 of 22,756 by trust here, #11,516 by citations
• Global and Planetary Change — 17 citations into it; #3,155 of 10,225 by trust here, #6,266 by citations
• Electrical and Electronic Engineering — 12 citations into it
• Management Science and Operations Research — 8 citations into it
• Statistics and Probability — 6 citations into it

Whom Leah Stokes trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Gregory F. Nemet
2. Toby D. Couture
3. C. Mitchell
4. Pablo del Río González
5. Jens Hainmueller
6. Joanna I. Lewis
7. Lucy Butler
8. Ulrich Dewald
9. B. Roe
10. T. Bernauer

Who trusts Leah Stokes overall

1. Hanna L. Breetz
2. M. Mildenberger
3. Jessica F. Green
4. J. Finnegan
5. Nurcan Kilinc‐Ata
6. Parrish Bergquist
7. Lauren A. Feldman

Papers from Leah Stokes's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Leah Stokes trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Prices versus quantities: choosing policies for promoting the development of renewable energy
2. Beyond the learning curve: factors influencing cost reductions in photovoltaics
3. Comparison of feed-in tariff, quota and auction mechanisms to support wind power development
4. Effectiveness through risk reduction: a comparison of the renewable obligation in England and Wales and the feed-in system in Germany
5. An analysis of feed-in tariff remuneration models: Implications for renewable energy investment
6. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics (American Political Science Review)
7. Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change
8. Political Competition, Path Dependence, and the Strategy of Sustainable Energy Transitions
9. Policymaker's Guide to Feed-in Tariff Policy Design
10. REGULATORY DESIGN FOR RES-E SUPPORT MECHANISMS: LEARNING CURVES, MARKET STRUCTURE, AND BURDEN-SHARING

Their papers

• Renewable energy policy design and framing influence public support in the United States (2017) — 287 citations
• The political logics of clean energy transitions (2018) — 196 citations
• The politics of renewable energy policies: The case of feed-in tariffs in Ontario, Canada (2013) — 258 citations
• Combining climate, economic, and social policy builds public support for climate action in the US (2020) — 200 citations
• Short Circuiting Policy (2020) — 276 citations