Demand-pull, technology-push, and government-led incentives for non-incremental technical change
By Gregory F. Nemet. 2009
778 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7144f3424a577ce9162d4f78659dcc1663e455bd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Tobias S. Schmidt
- Karoline S. Rogge
- V. H. Hoffmann
- David Popp
- Malte H. G. Schneider
- Antoine Dechezleprêtre
- Leah Stokes
- Joern Hoppmann
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Tobias S. Schmidt
- Leah Stokes
- Evan Johnson
- V. H. Hoffmann
- Adam B. Jaffe
- Joern Hoppmann
- M. Peters
- Malte H. G. Schneider
Citations in the corpus
- The role of transnational dimensions in emerging economy 'Technological Innovation Systems' for clean-tech (2015, background): “…because the successful development of clean-tech requires government intervention, in the form of e.g., the creation of protected ‘niche’ markets, subsidies for consumption and/or R&D, or government procurement that favours environmentally benign alternatives (Bergek et al., 2008b; Nemet, 2009).”
- Demand-pull and technology-push public support for eco-innovation: The case of the biofuels sector (2015, methodology): “However, only recently scholars have focused on the differentiated impact of these instruments on the diverse types of innovative activities such as those related to the introduction of incremental or radical innovations (Nemet, 2009), suggesting that demand-pull policies may benefit mature technolo”
- Do Important Inventions Benefit from Knowledge Originating in Other Technological Domains (2012, methodology): “We choose a 10-year window, rather than the shorter 5-year window used in related work (Mariani, 2004; Nemet, 2009) to account for the possibility that novel combinations take longer to be used in subsequent inventions.”
- Negative emissions—Part 3: Innovation and upscaling (2018, methodology): “‘Demand-pull’ drivers increase the pay-offs to innovation, e.g. by increasing the demand for new technologies in the market place (Nemet 2009).”
- The two faces of market support—How deployment policies affect technological exploration and exploitation in the solar photovoltaic industry (2013, background): “A recent study by Nemet (2009) underscores the importance of analyzing the innovation effects of deployment policies on a more disaggregated level.”
- National and Sub-national Policies and Institutions (2014, background): “The central insight from the empirical literature is that both technology push and demand pull 2 policies are required to be most effective (Nemet, 2009).”
- Environmental Policy and Directed Technological Change: Evidence from the European Carbon Market (2012, neutral): “Nemet (2009) and Hoppmann et al. (2013) raise a related concern—that a policy like the EU ETS might discourage nonincremental innovation (more likely to be counted as high-value patents).”
- Japan's post-Fukushima Challenge - Implications from the German Experience on Renewable Energy Policy (2012, background): “However, cases such wind in Californian in the 1980s (see Nemet, 2009) and the PV FIT in Germany show that there are important context and technology-specific factors that may lead to adverse outcomes.”
- Inventor Networks in Renewable Energies: The Influence of the Policy Mix in Germany (2016, background): “In general, these instruments create or increase demand for a product which allows the producing company to gain revenues, which can be reinvested in R&D activities (e.g. Nemet 2009, Hoppmann et al. 2013).”
- The politics of renewable energy policies: The case of feed-in tariffs in Ontario, Canada (2013, background): “…unclear whether governments should allocate funding for energy innovation to technology-push mechanisms, through knowledge creation and research and development (R&D), or to demand-pull mechanisms, through market creation via subsidies or guaranteed markets (Jaffe et al., 2005; Nemet, 2006, 2009).”