Loes Aaldering

Gender Studies · 2018–2020

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 3 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Gender Studies — 7 citations into it
• Sociology and Political Science — 5 citations into it

Whom Loes Aaldering trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. Elizabeth Tipton
2. L. Hedges
3. A. Eagly
4. Anne M. Koenig
5. Monica C. Schneider

Who trusts Loes Aaldering overall

1. D. J. Van der Pas

Papers from Loes Aaldering's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Loes Aaldering trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. (Psychology Review)
2. Robust variance estimation in meta‐regression with dependent effect size estimates (Research Synthesis Methods)
3. Small sample adjustments for robust variance estimation with meta-regression. (Psychological methods)
4. Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. (Psychological bulletin)
5. What Women and Men Should Be, Shouldn't be, are Allowed to be, and don't Have to Be: The Contents of Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes
6. Emotional, Sensitive, and Unfit for Office? Gender Stereotype Activation and Support Female Candidates
7. Measuring Stereotypes of Female Politicians
8. Are volatile voters erratic, whimsical or seriously picky? A panel study of 58 waves into the nature of electoral volatility (The Netherlands 2006–2010)
9. Political Leadership in the Media: Gender Bias in Leader Stereotypes during Campaign and Routine Times (British Journal of Political Science)
10. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under nonstandard conditions

Their papers

• Gender Differences in Political Media Coverage: A Meta-Analysis (2020) — 222 citations
• Political Leadership in the Media: Gender Bias in Leader Stereotypes during Campaign and Routine Times (2018) — 91 citations