P. De Castro

Research Integrity and Peer Review · 2016

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Whom P. De Castro trusts

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Douglas G. Altman (in Statistics and Probability)

Papers from P. De Castro's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers P. De Castro trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review (Medical Journal of Australia)
  2. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials (Obstetrics and Gynecology)
  3. Studying sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia: a consensus report. (Pain)
  4. The Girl Who Cried Pain: A Bias against Women in the Treatment of Pain
  5. Policy: NIH to balance sex in cell and animal studies (Nature)
  6. Is Volume Related to Outcome in Health Care? A Systematic Review and Methodologic Critique of the Literature (Annals of Internal Medicine)
  7. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. (The Lancet)
  8. Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle. (Controlled Clinical Trials)
  9. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (Annals of Internal Medicine)
  10. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. (New England Journal of Medicine)

Their papers