Studying sex and gender differences in pain and analgesia: a consensus report.

By J. Greenspan, R. Craft, L. Leresche, L. Arendt-Nielsen, Gender and Pain Sig of the Iasp the Consensus Working Group of the Sex. Pain, 2007

1,028 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Pharmacology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/76b5ae5f1a7897f29c86b6592809eee1d07c24bf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Y. Tousignant‐Laflamme
Shirin Heidari
E. Eriksson
Lorie A. Kloda
G. Dupuis
Ida Gremyr
M. Curno
M. Choinière

Citations in the corpus

A systematic literature review of 10 years of research on sex/gender and experimental pain perception – Part 1: Are there really differences between women and men? (2012, background): “The presence/absence of sex differences in response to experimental pain seems to vary as a function of the pain modalities being tested and the outcome measures being examined, which argues against the concept of greater generalized pain sensitivity in F subjects in a laboratory setting [73,76].”
Sex Bias in Neuroscience and Biomedical Research (2010, neutral): “…asthma, anxiety disorders, depression, multiple sclerosis, and osteoporosis, and practical considerations preclude testing of both sexes, then predominantly females should be investigated (c.f., Greenspan et al., 2007) as appears to have happened for multiple sclerosis studies in 2009 (see above).”
Sex and Gender Equity in Research: rationale for the SAGER guidelines and recommended use (2016, background): “More than 79 % of animal studies published in Pain over a 10-year period included male subjects only, and only 4 % studied sex differences [9].”
“Brave Men” and “Emotional Women”: A Theory-Guided Literature Review on Gender Bias in Health Care and Gendered Norms towards Patients with Chronic Pain (2018, background): “+ere are convincing findings that biological differences contribute to the observed sex differences [2, 3, 7].”
The organizational-activational hypothesis as the foundation for a unified theory of sexual differentiation of all mammalian tissues (2009, neutral): “The framework has been expanded to explain a large majority of sex differences in phenotype of all non-gonadal tissues (e.g., Beatty, 1984; Greenspan et al., 2007).”