J. Doerner

Sociology and Political Science · 2010–2014

A researcher in the Science corpus: 2 papers; trusts 4 researchers and is trusted by 1 researcher here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom J. Doerner trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Stephen Demuth
  2. D. Steffensmeier
  3. C. Spohn
  4. Richard A. Berk
  5. Jeffery T. Ulmer
  6. Timothy Griffin
  7. S. Bushway

Who trusts J. Doerner overall

  1. J. Wooldredge
  2. Jeffery T. Ulmer

Papers from J. Doerner's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers J. Doerner trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Thirty Years of Sentencing Reform: The Quest for a Racially Neutral Sentencing Process
  2. THE EFFECT OF GENDER ON THE DECISION TO INCARCERATE BEFORE AND AFTER THE INTRODUCTION OF SENTENCING GUIDELINES
  3. What You Can and Can’t Properly Do with Regression
  4. Ethnicity and Sentencing Outcomes in U.S. Federal Courts: Who is Punished More Harshly? (American Sociological Review)
  5. RACIAL AND ETHNIC DISPARITIES IN SENTENCING DEPARTURES ACROSS MODES OF CONVICTION
  6. RACIAL AND ETHNIC DIFFERENCES IN PRETRIAL RELEASE DECISIONS AND OUTCOMES: A COMPARISON OF HISPANIC, BLACK, AND WHITE FELONY ARRESTEES*
  7. DOWNWARD DEPARTURES FOR SERIOUS VIOLENT OFFENDERS: LOCAL COURT “CORRECTIONS” TO PENNSYLVANIA'S SENTENCING GUIDELINES*
  8. IMAGES OF DANGER AND CULPABILITY: RACIAL STEREOTYPING, CASE PROCESSING, AND CRIMINAL SENTENCING*
  9. ETHNICITY AND JUDGES' SENTENCING DECISIONS: HISPANIC‐BLACK‐WHITE COMPARISONS
  10. MODELING THE EFFECTS OF LEGALLY RELEVANT AND EXTRALEGAL FACTORS UNDER SENTENCING GUIDELINES: THE RULES HAVE CHANGED

Their papers