R. Dean

Statistics and Probability · 2016

A researcher in the Science corpus: 1 paper; trusts 2 researchers and is trusted by 0 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom R. Dean trusts

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Julian P. T. Higgins (in Statistics and Probability)
  2. S. Green (in Statistics and Probability)

Papers from R. Dean's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers R. Dean trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. On the bias produced by quality scores in meta-analysis, and a hierarchical view of proposed solutions. (Biostatistics)
  2. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (International Coaching Psychology Review)
  3. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
  4. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS
  5. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Supplements for Primary and Secondary Prevention: Mortality in Randomized Trials of Antioxidant
  6. The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
  7. Observational studies analyzed like randomized experiments: an application to postmenopausal hormone therapy and coronary heart disease (Epidemiology)
  8. Using Big Data to Emulate a Target Trial When a Randomized Trial Is Not Available. (American Journal of Epidemiology)
  9. Beyond Significance Testing: Reforming Data Analysis Methods in Behavioral Research
  10. Forest plots: trying to see the wood and the trees (British medical journal)

Their papers