A programmatic approach to measuring perfectionism: The Almost Perfect Scales.

247 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Misunderstood Schema of the Strong Black Woman: Exploring Its Mental Health Consequences and Coping Responses Among African American Women (2020, background): “Slaney, Rice, and Ashby (2002) also indicated that the Discrepancy subscale captures the defining aspect of MP, which is the presence of a perceived discrepancy between one’s standards and actual performance.”
The Perils of Perfectionism in Sports and Exercise (2005, background): “That is, although dimensions such as socially prescribed perfectionism and excessive concern over mistakes have been associated with maladjustment, it has been suggested that other dimensions, such as self-oriented perfectionism and high personal standards, may, in fact, be positive factors (Slaney ”
Perfectionism, Depression, Loneliness, and Life Satisfaction (2009, background): “…and discriminant validity of the scores derived from APS-R subscales provide a promising nomological network of relationships (Ashby & Kottman, 1996; LoCicero & Ashby, 2000; Rice, Ashby, & Slaney, 1998; Rice & Slaney, 2002; Slaney et al., 2002; Slaney et al., 2001; Suddarth & Slaney, 2001).”
Evaluative Concerns and Personal Standards Perfectionism: Self-esteem as a Mediator and Moderator of Relations with Personal and Academic Needs and Estimated GPA (2008, methodology): “1993), and APS-R (Slaney et al. 2001; Slaney et al. 2002) in both college and clinical populations has been well established.”