Steven G. Newmaster

Molecular Biology · 2002–2011

A researcher in the Science corpus: 6 papers; trusts 9 researchers and is trusted by 1 researcher here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom Steven G. Newmaster trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. R. Small
  2. Mark L. Blaxter
  3. Paul D. N. Hebert
  4. Marc Stoeckle
  5. Claude E. Shannon
  6. Anne E. Magurran
  7. G. Saunders
  8. J. Wendel
  9. W. John Kress
  10. R. Cronn

Who trusts Steven G. Newmaster overall

  1. K. Frego
  2. W. John Kress
  3. Cara R. Nelson
  4. P. Hollingsworth
  5. D. McDevit
  6. G. Saunders
  7. Jing Yu

Papers from Steven G. Newmaster's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers Steven G. Newmaster trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. The promise of a DNA taxonomy. (Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences)
  2. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes (Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences)
  3. Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
  4. Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. (Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution)
  5. Ten species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America)
  6. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species (Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences)
  7. Species-Level Paraphyly and Polyphyly: Frequency, Causes, and Consequences, with Insights from Animal Mitochondrial DNA
  8. Identification of Birds through DNA Barcodes (PLoS Biology)
  9. Molecular barcodes for soil nematode identification (Molecular Ecology)
  10. Myth of the molecule: DNA barcodes for species cannot replace morphology for identification and classification (Cladistics)

Their papers