Molecular barcodes for soil nematode identification

By R. Floyd, Eyualem Abebe, A. Papert, Mark L. Blaxter. Molecular Ecology, 2002

777 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/8c528ca89d807d7a6511ca1ef1550f5c39456893

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Barcoding diatoms: evaluation of the V4 subregion on the 18S rRNA gene, including new primers and protocols (2011, background): “The 18S rRNA gene has been suggested as a potential barcoding marker for various organism groups, e.g. nematodes, tardigrades, and diatoms (Bhadury et al. 2006; Blaxter 2004; Blaxter et al. 2004; Floyd et al. 2002; Jahn et al. 2007; Powers 2004).”
DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. (2006, methodology): “Most studies use tree-based identification tools based on neighbor-joining trees (Barrett and Hebert, 2005; Floyd et al., 2002; Hebert et al., 2003a; Tautz et al., 2003).”
Nutritional evaluation of cookies produced from pigeon pea, cocoyam and sorghum flour blends (2011, background): “These regions have different modes and functions in evolution and are suited for use differentiating phylogenetically across the phylum and closely related populations and taxa (Al-Banna et al., 1997; Blaxter et al., 1998; Courtright et al., 2002; De Ley and Bert, 2002; Floyd et al., 2002).”
Spatiotemporal analysis of population genetic structure in Geomonhystera disjuncta (Nematoda, Monhysteridae) reveals high levels of molecular diversity (2007, background): “A promising alternative for DNA barcoding purposes in nematode groups for which COI was not a good marker seem to be the SSU and LSU rDNA segments (Floyd et al. 2002; Blaxter 2004; De Ley et al. 2005), which also works well for P. marina (Derycke et al. 2007).”
DNA barcoding reveals cryptic diversity in marine hydroids (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa) from coastal and deep‐sea environments (2007, background): “…short genetic markers (DNA ‘barcodes’), to rapidly assign unknown individuals, life-history stages and forensic or subfossil material to known species or even populations or to aid the discovery of cryptic biodiversity, was first proposed by Floyd et al. (2002) and Hebert et al. (2003a,b).”
DNA barcoding for ecologists. (2009, methodology): “Thus, the estimation of biodiversity indices can be based on molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTU) detected using the barcoding approach [ 1 ,42], where the relative abundances of each type of DNA sequence (MOTU) replace the classical relative abundance of each species estimated from the numb”
Biological identifications of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) using DNA barcodes (2005, methodology): “A molecular identification system, using small subunit RNA, was effective at classifying nematodes into molecular operational taxonomic units (Floyd et al. 2002).”
Who is eating what: diet assessment using next generation sequencing (2012, background): “…on a common barcode sequence are also currently used for assessing ecological diversity when taxon assignation is not possible (see for example, the studies by Floyd et al. 2002; Blaxter et al. 2005; Bohmann et al. 2011), and dedicated program exit that MOTUs (e.g. jMOTU, Jones et al. 2011).”
DNA barcoding as a tool for coral reef conservation (2007, methodology): “Nematode taxonomists favor the use of 18S and 28S ribosomal genes (Floyd et al. 2002; Powers 2004).”
A general species delimitation method with applications to phylogenetic placements (2013, methodology): “To identify new species, taxonomy-independent methods or de novo OTU-picking approaches are used to initially cluster sequences into so-called molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTUs) (Floyd et al. , 2002; Goldstein and DeSalle, 2011; Vogler and Monaghan, 2007).”
Soil biodiversity and DNA barcodes: opportunities and challenges (2015, background): “Targeted approaches have been published for some well-studied groups (e.g. nematodes; Floyd et al., 2002; Griffiths et al., 2006) but are lacking for others (e.g. soil mites or enchytraeids).”
A comparison of algorithms for the identification of specimens using DNA barcodes: examples from gymnosperms (2007, methodology): “However, the distance-based approach is favored by some proponents (e.g., Floyd et al., 2002; Hebert et al., 2003; Blaxter, 2004; Lambert et al., 2005) whom advocate a strict divergence threshold above which sequences are considered to belong to separate species and below which the sequences are…”