David C. Hoaglin

Statistics and Probability · 2002–2011

A researcher in the Science corpus: 5 papers; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 11 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom David C. Hoaglin trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Thomas Lumley
  2. Guobing Lu
  3. A. Ades
  4. A. Sutton
  5. David J. Spiegelhalter
  6. S. Dias
  7. Emanuel Parzen
  8. Julian P. T. Higgins
  9. Jeroen P. Jansen

Who trusts David C. Hoaglin overall

  1. Daniel Furtado Ferreira
  2. Rand R. Wilcox
  3. Nor Aishah Ahad
  4. Georgia Salanti
  5. Reza Shokri
  6. David M Erceg-Hurn
  7. Sin Yin Teh
  8. Martin Strobel
  9. Florence Clark
  10. Abdul Rahman Othman

Papers from David C. Hoaglin's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers David C. Hoaglin trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit
  2. Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
  3. Indirect comparisons of competing interventions. (Health Technology Assessment)
  4. How vague is vague? A simulation study of the impact of the use of vague prior distributions in MCMC using WinBUGS
  5. Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons (Statistics in Medicine)
  6. Assessing Evidence Inconsistency in Mixed Treatment Comparisons
  7. Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (Statistics in Medicine)
  8. Interpreting indirect treatment comparisons and network meta-analysis for health-care decision making: report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: part 1. (Value in Health)
  9. Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (Statistics in Medicine)
  10. Incident diabetes in clinical trials of antihypertensive drugs: a network meta-analysis. (The Lancet)

Their papers